AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |
Back to Blog
Joe rogan nasa jacket episode11/19/2023 "Nothing is going to solve this challenge with one stroke, but there are things to mitigate harm that can be done." Does deplatforming dangerous 'influencers' work? "Obviously, nothing is the magic bullet," she said. Ms Wirtschafter warned that, due to the size and loyalty of his audience, if Rogan left Spotify it may inadvertently increase his reach, as his content could then be shared across multiple platforms without oversight. "It's profitable to be polarising," Ms Wirtschafter said. In 2020, Spotify reportedly paid Rogan more than $US100 million ($140 million) for the exclusive rights to his podcast, which averages 11 million listeners per episode, meaning he is among the most listened-to men in the world. Previously, he was a Ultimate Fighting Championship (UFC) commentator and host of the US version of the TV show Fear Factor. Meanwhile, another key player in the digital information economy - podcasting - has mostly avoided scrutiny.Īccording to Valerie Wirtschafter, a senior data analyst at the Brookings Institution, many podcasts are hotbeds of conspiracy theories, climate change denialism, and anti-democratic sentiments. In recent years, social media giants such as Meta (formerly Facebook), Twitter and YouTube have faced increased public and regulatory pressure over how they manage misinformation, disinformation and extremism on their platforms. 'It's profitable to be polarising': The challenges of moderation The company has since published its " platform rules and approach to COVID-19" on its website. "I want to make one point very clear: I do not believe that silencing Joe is the answer," he said. Spotify CEO Daniel Elk told employees he condemned Rogan's use of the slur but that "cancelling voices is a slippery slope". So far, Spotify has tepidly backed its divisive star. However, around 100 episodes of his podcast have been quietly removed from the platform since the compilation of slurs was shared on Instagram. "I've never tried to do anything with this podcast other than to just talk to people."Īmid the growing backlash online, a video compilation surfaced showing Rogan repeatedly using a racial slur, for which he recently apologised. "I'm not trying to promote misinformation, I'm not trying to be controversial," Rogan said in a video on his Instagram. The group described the episode - which was the catalyst for the campaign to boycott the streaming platform led by musicians Neil Young and Joni Mitchell - as "objectionable and offensive, but also medically and culturally dangerous". The letter has since attracted hundreds more signatories. Joe Rogan's interview with Dr Malone is more than three hours long and littered with scaremongering about vaccines and references to unproven COVID-19 treatments.Īfter the episode was uploaded, an open letter signed by more than 250 concerned figures, including immunologists, emergency doctors, nurses and scientists, called on Spotify to "establish a clear and public policy to moderate misinformation". That actually discredits me." The Joe Rogan predicament "In the normal world that I live in, doing research on social behaviour during COVID, fact-checking a claim about human behaviour during COVID, would be seen as an asset. "I was able to see how they were trying to smear me," he said. "People tracked down my partner and kids on Instagram and made kind of creepy, perverse comments to them," he said.Īs unsettling as the experience was, it gave Mr Van Bavel a rare glimpse into the warped world of conspiracy theorists. He was also harassed at work by phone and email, he said, and reported to his superiors at NYU for "fraud". He recalled receiving "hundreds or maybe thousands" of angry comments and private messages on Twitter, Instagram and LinkedIn. When the article fact-checking Dr Malone's comments went viral, Mr Van Bavel was inundated by attacks from trolls. And it was just referencing Robert Malone himself talking about it. "When I did a Google Scholar search … I didn't find a single article on it. "I've never once seen it in a talk, at a conference, in a book," he said. The first time he came across "mass formation psychosis" was when a Reuters journalist asked him if the concept was real. Mr Van Bavel has studied group identities for nearly 20 years and co-authored a book on the topic.
0 Comments
Read More
Leave a Reply. |